Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with Homogeneous Emphysema.

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves exercise capacity, lung function, and quality of life in patients with heterogenous emphysema on computed tomographic and perfusion scan. However, most patients have a nonheterogenous type of destruction. These patients, summarized under "homogeneous emphysema," may also benefit from LVRS as long they are severely hyperinflated, and adequate function is remaining with a diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide greater than 20% and no pulmonary hypertension. Surgical mortality is low when patients are well selected.

Clinical phenotypes and heath-related quality of life of COPD patients in a rural setting in Malaysia - a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The Spanish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guideline phenotypes patients according to the exacerbation frequency and COPD subtypes. In this study, we compared the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) according to their COPD phenotypes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of COPD patients who attended the outpatient clinic of the Serian Divisional Hospital and Bau District Hospital from 23th January 2018 to 22th January 2019. The HRQoL was assessed using modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-c). RESULTS: Of 185 patients, 108 (58.4%) were non-exacerbators (NON-AE), 51 (27.6%) were frequent exacerbators (AE), and the remaining 26 (14.1%) had asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). Of AE patients, 42 (82.4%) had chronic bronchitis and only 9 (17.6%) had emphysema. Of the 185 COPD patients, 65.9% had exposure to biomass fuel and 69.1% were ex- or current smokers. The scores of mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c were significantly different between COPD phenotypes (p <  0.001). There were significantly more patients with mMRC 2-4 among AE (68.6%) (p <  0.001), compared to those with ACO (38.5%) and NON-AE (16.7%). AE patients had significantly higher total CAT (p = 0.003; p <  0.001) and SGRQ-c (both p <  0.001) scores than those with ACO and NON-AE. Patients with ACO had significantly higher total CAT and SGRQ-c (both p <  0.001) scores than those with NON-AE. AE patients had significantly higher score in each item of CAT and component of SGRQ-c compared to those with NON-AE (all p <  0.001), and ACO [(p = 0.003-0.016; p = < 0.001-0.005) except CAT 1, 2 and 7. ACO patients had significantly higher score in each item of CAT and component of SGRQ-c (p = < 0.001-0.040; p <  0.001) except CAT 2 and activity components of SGRQ-c. CONCLUSIONS: The HRQoL of COPD patients was significantly different across different COPD phenotypes. HRQoL was worst in AE, followed by ACO and NON-AE. This study supports phenotyping COPD patients based on their exacerbation frequency and COPD subtypes. The treatment of COPD should be personalised according to these two factors.

Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The RENEW trial demonstrated that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils improves quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise performance. In this post hoc analysis of RENEW, we examine the mechanism of action of endobronchial coils that drives improvement in clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 78 patients from the RENEW coil-treated group who were treated in one or both lobes that were deemed as the most destroyed were included in this retrospective analysis. Expiratory and inspiratory HRCT scans were used to assess lobar volume change from baseline to 12 months post coil treatment in treated and untreated lobes. RESULTS: Reduction in lobar RV in treated lobes was significantly associated with favourable clinical improvement. Independent predictor of the change in RV and FEV1 was the change in lobar RV reduction in the treated lobes and for change in 6MWD the absence of cardiac disease and the change in SGRQ, while the independent predictor of change in SGRQ was the change in 6MWD. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that residual lobar volume reduction in treated lobes measured by QCT is the driving mechanism of action of endobronchial coils leading to positive clinical outcomes. However, the improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life seems to be affected by the presence of cardiac disease.

A retrospective evaluation of the pulmonary function tests and quality of life assessment surveys of emphysema patients subject to coil treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchoscopic volume reduction treatments are among the important alternatives for selected emphysema patients with a dyspneic course despite optimal medical treatment. Our aim was to carry out a retrospective scan of the data for COPD patients subject to coil treatment at our center for assessing whether coil procedure has an impact on the respiratory symptom and pulmonary function tests in COPD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 41 patients with severe emphysema and treated with coils between 2017-2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs were completed for all patients prior to the procedure and they were assessed with pulmonary function test (PFT), diffusing capacity for carbonmonoxide test (DLCO), body plethysmography, 6-minute walk test, ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Data acquired prior to the procedure and 3rd month control data after the procedure were recorded and SGRQ was applied via face-to-face interviews during the controls by doctors working on Pulmonary Diseases as was the case before the procedure. RESULT: SGRQ questionnaires of 32 patients were evaluated. Statistically significant changes were observed after the procedure in symptom, activity, impact score and total score which were calculated prior to the procedure. Pre and post procedure FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PEF, FEF25/75 parameters were used for the comparison made via SFT. Statistically significant changes were observed in FEV1, FVC, FEF25/75 when the pre and post-procedure SFT parameters of the 32 patients included in the study were compared. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant improvement was observed in the PFT parameters and quality of life questionnaires following the coil procedure which is a bronchoscopic volume reduction procedure.

Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is the definitive treatment for patients with severe emphysema. There is still a need for long-term data concerning the outcomes of this procedure. This study presents long-term longitudinal data on LVRS including correlation of quality of life (QOL) with pulmonary function testing metrics and includes additional analysis of patients with heterogeneous and homogeneous emphysema. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data collected from patients undergoing LVRS over a 9-year period at a single center was performed (N = 93). Pulmonary function and 6-minute walk tests as well as QOL questionnaires were administered before and 1 year after surgery. Descriptive statistics were reported for clinical outcomes and QOL indices. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to examine changes from baseline to end of 1-year follow-up. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate relationships between clinical and QOL outcomes. RESULTS: At 1-year post surgery, mean forced vital capacity (46%, P ≤ .0001), forced expiratory volume (43%, P ≤ .0001), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (16%, P ≤ .0001), and 6-minute walk distance (20%, P ≤ .0001) were increased from baseline, while residual volume decreased (23%, P ≤ .0001). There was a positive correlation between changes in QOL and forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, and, 6-minute walk distance. Patients having heterogeneous disease had greater improvements in forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, residual volume, and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, and greater QOL compared with patients with homogeneous disease. CONCLUSIONS: LVRS continues to be a valuable treatment option for patients with advanced emphysema with reproducible improvements in clinical and QOL metrics. Careful patient selection and optimization prior to surgery are crucial to successful outcomes.

[Longterm Homecare Augmentation Program in Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficient Patients]. / Langzeit-Augmentationstherapie von Patienten mit Alpha-1-Antitrypsin-Mangel in der häuslichen Pflege.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation with human alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor is the only specific treatment for Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD), a rare genetic disease with symptoms of progressive COPD. OBJECTIVES: A prospective long-term exploration of outcomes during the "Alpha-1-Mobile" home care AAT augmentation program in seven advanced-stage patients. METHODS: Patients received weekly i. v. AAT augmentation and COPD therapy. Symptoms, lung function, health status, quality-of-life aspects, and safety were documented continuously. Outcomes during six years of home care augmentation therapy were observed and evaluated on an inter- and intraindividual basis. FEV1 profiles were compared to pre-program data. RESULTS: The seven patients had a mean age of 56.7 (40-68) years and had previously received augmentation for 8.8 (1-19) years. Compared to the three-year preprogram period, functional decline of FEV1 (ΔFEV1 0.47 L vs 0.17 L) slowed. Mean QoL scores showed seasonal fluctuations in the first three years of observation, and then stabilized. All blood samples tested exceeded the protective threshold of 50 mg/dL with a dose of 60 mg AAT/kg/week. Less than one exacerbation-related hospitalization occurred per patient-year. No adverse events of related to augmentation therapy were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Home care with i. v. augmentation therapy by medical professionals contributes to optimum care through consistent treatment and close health-status monitoring in our collective. Exacerbation-related hospitalizations were largely avoided. "Alpha-1-Mobile" was well accepted, practical, and safe.

The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy.

Objective: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it is not really known what amount of TLVR is crucial following valve implantation. Patients and methods: TLVR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were assessed before and 3 months after valve implantation in 119 patients. TLVR was calculated based on computed tomography (CT) scan analysis using imaging software (Apollo; VIDA Diagnostics). Minimal important difference estimates were calculated by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Results: Patients treated with valves experienced a mean change of 0.11 L in FEV1, -0.51 L in RV, 44 m in 6-MWD and a TLVR of 945 mL. Using a linear regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on two of three anchors (ΔFEV1, ΔRV), the estimated minimal important difference for TLVR was between 890 and 1,070 mL (ie, 49%-54% of the baseline TLV). Conclusion: In future, a TLVR between 49% and 54% of the baseline TLV, should be used when interpreting the clinical relevance.

The influence of lung volume reduction with intrabronchial valves on the quality of life of patients with heterogeneous emphysema - a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: A heterogeneous emphysema is one of the most severe forms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In some cases, besides the standard pharmacotherapy, a new treatment option of emphysema can be used - bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with the use of intrabronchial valves. OBJECTIVES: To examine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with severe emphysema after intrabronchial valve (IBV) implantation for the treatment of one lung. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2011 to 2013 a single centre prospective observational study was performed. The study assessed the effect of the therapeutic BLVR intervention, measured by St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). A statistical analysis by use of Wilcoxon test for dependent variables was performed. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled to the study (mean age 63 ± 10 years), all ex-smokers with tobacco exposure 38 ± 11.3 packyears. After 3 months of IBV treatment the average SGRQ score improved significantly in total (-12.8; p < 0.001) and in domains and the differences were for: "symptoms" (-8.5; p < 0.001), "activity" (-13.9; p < 0.001) and "influence on life"(-13.5; p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The presented study revealed a significant improvement of the quality in the life measured by SGRQ after IBV treatment for heterogeneous emphysema. For the first time our study showed the significant improvement of all three domains of SGRQ after IBV treatment.

Bronchoscopic Coil Treatment for Patients with Severe Emphysema: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic coil treatment has been shown to improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with severe emphysema. OBJECTIVES: To perform a meta-analysis of the results of four independent European clinical trials investigating this coil therapy for emphysema. METHODS: Data on all patients included in the four European clinical trials were analyzed for efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2,536 coils were placed during 259 procedures in 140 patients. A total of 37 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and 27 pneumonias were recorded as serious adverse events up to 1 year after treatment. The pneumothorax rate was 6.4%. Both 6 and 12 months after treatment, significant (all p < 0.001) improvements were observed for: forced expiratory volume in 1 s [+0.08 liters (±0.19) and +0.08 liters (±0.21)], residual volume [RV; -510 ml (±850) and -430 ml (±720)], 6-min walking distance [6MWD; +44.1 m (±69.8) and +38.1 m (±71.9)], and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score [SGRQ; -9.5 points (±14.3) and -7.7 points (±14.2)]. No differences in any outcome measures were observed between heterogeneous and homogeneous emphysema patients. Only a high baseline RV was found to be an independent predictor of successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopic coil treatment improves pulmonary function, 6MWD, and quality of life in patients with severe emphysema up to 1 year after treatment, independent of the distribution of the disease.

Long-term follow-up of high-risk patients in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial.

BACKGROUND: The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) was a randomized clinical trial designed to compare lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) with maximal medical care for patients with severe emphysema. The trial was halted early for a subgroup of patients with severe lung disease. We report longer term follow-up for this high-risk subgroup. METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial, patients with moderate to severe emphysema were assigned to LVRS plus maximal medical care or to maximal medical care alone and followed prospectively for vital status over 15 years. We focus on 140 high-risk patients. Quality of life data were available through 6 years of follow-up and were assessed using the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire and the Self-Administered Quality of Well-Being Scale. RESULTS: Through the first 3 years of follow-up, surgical patients in the high-risk subgroup had a significantly higher probability of death. However, the mortality curves crossed and there was a trend favoring surgical treatment through the remainder of the follow-up. The log-rank test suggested that the 2 groups were not significantly different (p=0.95) in survival. Quality of life data suggested an advantage of LVRS through the first 5 years of follow-up (p<0.01). The combined quality-adjusted survival model favored the medical group for the first few years of follow-up and favored the LVRS group after 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The NETT was stopped early for high-risk patients with severe lung disease. Longer term follow-up suggests that surgical patients in this high-risk subgroup ultimately achieved comparable outcomes. The high risk of death within 30 days of the surgery may discourage use of the procedure for high-risk patients despite the potential for better long-term outcomes.

Diagnostic performance comparison of the Chartis System and high-resolution computerized tomography fissure analysis for planning endoscopic lung volume reduction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy is optimized in patients who demonstrate little or no collateral ventilation (CV). The accuracy of the Chartis System and visual assessment of high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) fissure completeness by a core radiology laboratory for classifying CV status was compared by evaluating the relationship of each method with target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) after EBV placement. METHODS: Retrospective HRCT fissure analysis of a study population who underwent catheter-based measurement of CV followed by complete occlusion of the targeted lobe by EBV. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the HRCT fissure analysis and the catheter-based measurement of CV for predicting TLVR was determined. RESULTS: Accuracy for correctly classifying TLVR with EBV was similar for Chartis System and HRCT fissure analysis (74 vs 77%). The sensitivity and specificity of the Chartis measurement were 86% and 61% and those of HRCT fissure analysis 75% and 79%. Patients with TLVR ≥ 350 mL had statistically significant improvement in respiratory function, exercise performance and quality of life measures. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating patients for likelihood of successful EBV therapy, the Chartis System CV assessment and HRCT fissure analysis appear to have comparable accuracy. Both techniques were found to be beneficial for EBV procedure planning.

Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Few treatment options exist for patients with severe emphysema. We assessed the clinical benefits and safety of lung volume reduction coils (LVRCs) for the treatment of patients with severe emphysema with hyperinflation. METHODS: In a randomised study, we recruited patients with severe emphysema (aged ≥35 years) from three centres in the UK. Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly allocated patients in a one-to-one ratio (block sizes of four and stratified by centre) to either LVRC treatment (treatment group) or best medical care (usual care group). The primary endpoint was the difference in response in the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) between treatment and usual care groups at 90 days after final treatment (by intention-to-treat analysis). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01334307. FINDINGS: Between Jan 27, 2010, to Oct 25, 2011, we recruited and randomly allocated 47 patients: 23 to treatment and 24 to usual care (23 patients in each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis). SGRQ response at 90 days after final treatment was greater in the treatment group than it was in the usual care group (between-group difference in change from baseline -8·36 points [95% CI -16·24 to -0·47]; p=0·04). We detected no between-group difference in serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that treatment with endobronchial coils can improve quality of life for patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation. FUNDING: PneumRx.

Housing and respiratory health at older ages.

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the population of England live in substandard housing. Previous research has suggested that poor-quality housing, particularly in terms of cold temperatures, mould, and damp, poses a health risk, particularly for older people. The present study aimed to examine the association between housing conditions and objectively measured respiratory health in a large general population sample of older people in England. DATA AND METHODS: Data on housing conditions, respiratory health and relevant covariates were obtained from the second wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Multivariate regression methods were used to test the association between contemporary housing conditions and respiratory health while accounting for the potential effect of other factors; including social class, previous life-course housing conditions and childhood respiratory health. RESULTS: Older people who were in fuel poverty or who did not live in a home they owned had significantly worse respiratory health as measured by peak expiratory flow rates. After accounting for covariates, these factors had no effect on any other measures of respiratory health. Self-reported housing problems were not consistently associated with respiratory health. CONCLUSIONS: The housing conditions of older people in England, particularly those associated with fuel poverty and living in rented accommodation, may be harmful to some aspects of respiratory health. This has implications for upcoming UK government housing and energy policy decisions.

Minimally invasive lung surgery and postoperative quality of life.

Quality of life (QOL) after medical interventions is paramount to the patient considering treatment recommendations. To understand QOL in thoracic surgery patients, one must examine the outcomes patients prioritize (preferences) from successful surgical therapy, overall functional status of thoracic surgery patients, the literature addressing QOL after thoracic surgery (TS) and the possible benefit of minimally invasive TS, and, finally, future directions of TS postoperative QOL research. The primary focus of this article is lung cancer surgery with mention of other thoracic disease such as empyema, pneumothorax, or emphysema, as well.

Do endobronchial valves improve outcomes in patients with emphysema?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether endobronchial valves improve outcomes in patients with severe emphysema. Eighty-seven papers were found using the reported search, of which seven represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial demonstrated that endobronchial valve increased forced expiratory volume in one second by 4.3% (95% confidence interval 1.4-7.2) and decreased by 2.5% in the control group (95% confidence interval -5.4 to 0.4) at a 6-month interval. This benefit is more marked in patients who do not have collateral ventilation into the area of lung being isolated as mapped by bronchoscopic physiological mapping (Chartis) or by computed tomography imaging documenting intact fissures. This evidence is reflected in the Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial. Patients treated with endobronchial valve with high heterogeneity and complete fissures had greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second at 6- and 12-month intervals. We conclude that endobronchial valve placement improves lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life in selected patients with emphysematous diseases.

Childhood physical abuse and respiratory disease in the community: the role of mental health and cigarette smoking.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have found an association between child abuse and respiratory disease in some populations, but the mechanisms remain unknown, and this association has not been examined in a representative community-based sample. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between childhood physical abuse and the odds of respiratory disease and to investigate the role of depression, anxiety, and pack-years of smoking in this association. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Midlife Development in the United States Survey (n = 3,032), a representative sample of adults aged 25-74 years. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between childhood abuse and current respiratory disease (past 12 months) and to examine whether pack-years of smoking, depression, and anxiety disorders mediated the relationship. RESULTS: Individuals who often experienced childhood abuse had a significantly increased odds of respiratory disease (odds ratio [OR] = 1.87 [1.21, 2.90]). The association was attenuated, after adjusting for demographic characteristics and pack-years of smoking, and was no longer significant after adjusting for depression and anxiety disorders. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with previous data suggesting a significant association between childhood abuse and respiratory disease and extend existing knowledge by providing initial evidence that demographic differences, depression and anxiety disorders, and lifetime cigarette smoking may mediate this observed relationship. Results require replication with longitudinal data in large community-based samples. Future studies that can explore potential biological mechanisms underlying the observed associations, such as immune factors, are needed next to better understand these relationships.